Our Holiday Book Guide for Justice-Minded Readers
For nearly a century, the ACLU has defended the freedom to read and to think for every American. As we approach the holiday season, we’ve selected a list of books about civil liberties, fitted perfectly with some of our most popular products to make the perfect gift for family members and friends.
This holiday season, we’re celebrating the power of stories with a curated collection of books, paired with unique items from the ACLU Shop, such as our banned book collection, aprons, tote bags, and more. Whether you’re gifting a thought-provoking read or a statement-making accessory, each purchase supports the ACLU’s mission to protect free speech and the right to learn.
Since 2021, thousands of book titles have been challenged or removed from school libraries, often targeting BIPOC authors, LGBTQ+ creators, and other marginalized voices. These efforts to ban books and restrict discussions, especially on race, gender, sexuality, and systemic injustice, are both unlawful and a serious threat to our right to learn.
Our series, “ACLU Bookshelf,” lets you join our fight and pick up the texts, novels, nonfiction stories, essays, and more that help us form a more perfect union – one page at a time.
So you need a gift for …
THE HISTORY BUFF
“Wake: The Hidden History of Women-Led Slave Revolts” by Rebecca Hall
“Wake: The Hidden History of Women-Led Slave Revolts” by Rebecca Hall is a blend of memoir, history, and graphic novel. Hall, a historian and granddaughter of enslaved people, investigates the overlooked pasts of Adono and Alele, women rebels who led and fought in slave revolts during the transatlantic slave trade. Combining archival research with historical imagination, she shows how women’s resistance has been erased from history. The book also chronicles how Hall faced racism, sexism, and institutional barriers throughout her research.
A Look Inside: “They say that the trauma of our ancestors are stored inside us: in our bodies, our minds, our spirits. So too is our resilience.”
“Wake: The Hidden History of Women-Led Slave Revolts” by Rebecca Hall is a blend of memoir, history, and graphic novel. Hall, a historian and granddaughter of enslaved people, investigates the overlooked pasts of Adono and Alele, women rebels who led and fought in slave revolts during the transatlantic slave trade. Combining archival research with historical imagination, she shows how women’s resistance has been erased from history. The book also chronicles how Hall faced racism, sexism, and institutional barriers throughout her research.
A Look Inside: “They say that the trauma of our ancestors are stored inside us: in our bodies, our minds, our spirits. So too is our resilience.”
THE FRIEND WHO ENJOYS BANNED BOOKS…
“The Color Purple” by Alice Walker
“The Color Purple” by Alice Walker is a novel set in the early 20th-century in Georgia. Told through letters between sisters Celie and Nettie, the novel spans 20 years of separation, faith, and love. The novel explores themes of abuse, oppression, and resilience and breaks the silence around domestic and sexual violence. Because of this, it has been frequently banned in school libraries. The story becomes a powerful journey of healing, self-discovery, redemption, and the transformative strength of love.
A Look Inside: “I am an expression of the divine, just like a peach is, just like a fish is. I have a right to be this way...I can't apologize for that, nor can I change it, nor do I want to... We will never have to be other than who we are in order to be successful...We realize that we are as ourselves unlimited and our experiences valid. It is for the rest of the world to recognize this, if they choose.”
“The Color Purple” by Alice Walker is a novel set in the early 20th-century in Georgia. Told through letters between sisters Celie and Nettie, the novel spans 20 years of separation, faith, and love. The novel explores themes of abuse, oppression, and resilience and breaks the silence around domestic and sexual violence. Because of this, it has been frequently banned in school libraries. The story becomes a powerful journey of healing, self-discovery, redemption, and the transformative strength of love.
A Look Inside: “I am an expression of the divine, just like a peach is, just like a fish is. I have a right to be this way...I can't apologize for that, nor can I change it, nor do I want to... We will never have to be other than who we are in order to be successful...We realize that we are as ourselves unlimited and our experiences valid. It is for the rest of the world to recognize this, if they choose.”
THE FAMILY MEMBER WHO LOVES TO TALK POLITICS
“Original Sins: The (Mis)education of Black and Native Children and the Construction of American Racism” by Eve L. Ewing
In “Original Sins,” Eve L. Ewing reveals how the U.S. education system was built to uphold racial hierarchies rather than promote equality. Tracing its origins to the nation’s founding, she shows how schools were designed to “civilize” Native children, train Black students for servitude, and reinforce white intellectual superiority. Ewing argues that these structures persist today through biased curriculum, standardized testing, academic tracking, and unequal resources. Exposing how education continues to sustain systemic inequality, she challenges readers to reconsider what schools are supposed to do, and for whom.
A Look Inside: “Just as the project of empire required fundamentally unintelligent beings, wild savages in need of discipline, so too did it require beings permanently positioned on the bottom rungs of the economic hierarchy. And educational institutions, once again, have played a vital role in reinforcing this narrative and the structures beneath it.”
In “Original Sins,” Eve L. Ewing reveals how the U.S. education system was built to uphold racial hierarchies rather than promote equality. Tracing its origins to the nation’s founding, she shows how schools were designed to “civilize” Native children, train Black students for servitude, and reinforce white intellectual superiority. Ewing argues that these structures persist today through biased curriculum, standardized testing, academic tracking, and unequal resources. Exposing how education continues to sustain systemic inequality, she challenges readers to reconsider what schools are supposed to do, and for whom.
A Look Inside: “Just as the project of empire required fundamentally unintelligent beings, wild savages in need of discipline, so too did it require beings permanently positioned on the bottom rungs of the economic hierarchy. And educational institutions, once again, have played a vital role in reinforcing this narrative and the structures beneath it.”
YOUR PROTEST BUDDY
“Civil Disobedience” by Henry David Thoreau
Published by transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” is a foundational essay advocating for individual conscience over government authority. Thoreau argues that people must not permit governments to override their moral judgment and have a duty to resist unjust laws. Prompted by his opposition to slavery and the Mexican-American War, he protested through his writings, by refusing to pay taxes, abolitionism, and through his non-material, simple lifestyle. Thoreau emphasizes nonviolent resistance and the power of individual integrity in confronting injustice. His ideas profoundly influenced later movements, shaping global understandings of protest, morality, and the responsibilities of citizenship.
A Look Inside: “If we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in Congress for our guidance, uncorrected by the seasonable experience and the effectual complaints of the people, America would not long retain her rank among the nations.”
Published by transcendentalist Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” is a foundational essay advocating for individual conscience over government authority. Thoreau argues that people must not permit governments to override their moral judgment and have a duty to resist unjust laws. Prompted by his opposition to slavery and the Mexican-American War, he protested through his writings, by refusing to pay taxes, abolitionism, and through his non-material, simple lifestyle. Thoreau emphasizes nonviolent resistance and the power of individual integrity in confronting injustice. His ideas profoundly influenced later movements, shaping global understandings of protest, morality, and the responsibilities of citizenship.
A Look Inside: “If we were left solely to the wordy wit of legislators in Congress for our guidance, uncorrected by the seasonable experience and the effectual complaints of the people, America would not long retain her rank among the nations.”
THE FRIEND WHO ONLY READS FICTION
“James” by Percival Everett
A re-imagined version of “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” “James” by Percival Everett is told from the perspective of Jim, the enslaved man in the original novel, renamed as James. Set in 19th-century Missouri, James is intellectually curious and literate, but hides his intelligence behind “slave talk” to survive. When he learns he will be sold away from his wife and daughter, he escapes and joins Huck on a raft journey down the Mississippi, reclaiming agency, teaching others to read, and confronting the brutal realities of slavery and identity.
A Look Inside: “At that moment the power of reading made itself clear and real to me. If I could see the words, then no one could control them or what I got from them. They couldn’t even know if I was merely seeing them or reading them, sounding them out or comprehending them. It was a completely private affair and completely free and, therefore, completely subversive.”
A re-imagined version of “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” “James” by Percival Everett is told from the perspective of Jim, the enslaved man in the original novel, renamed as James. Set in 19th-century Missouri, James is intellectually curious and literate, but hides his intelligence behind “slave talk” to survive. When he learns he will be sold away from his wife and daughter, he escapes and joins Huck on a raft journey down the Mississippi, reclaiming agency, teaching others to read, and confronting the brutal realities of slavery and identity.
A Look Inside: “At that moment the power of reading made itself clear and real to me. If I could see the words, then no one could control them or what I got from them. They couldn’t even know if I was merely seeing them or reading them, sounding them out or comprehending them. It was a completely private affair and completely free and, therefore, completely subversive.”
FOR THE KIDS
"A is for Activist" by Innosanto Nagara
“A is for Activist” is an alphabet board book that introduces the next generation of progressives to social justice, activism, and community engagement. For families who want their kids to grow up in a space that is unapologetic about equality, environmentalism, LGBTQ+ rights, collective action, and more.
A Look Inside: “A is for Activist. Advocate. Abolitionist. Ally. Are you an Activist?”
“A is for Activist” is an alphabet board book that introduces the next generation of progressives to social justice, activism, and community engagement. For families who want their kids to grow up in a space that is unapologetic about equality, environmentalism, LGBTQ+ rights, collective action, and more.
A Look Inside: “A is for Activist. Advocate. Abolitionist. Ally. Are you an Activist?”
FOR THE HOLIDAY CHEF
“We Fed an Island The True Story of Rebuilding Puerto Rico, One Meal at a Time” by José Andrés
“We Fed an Island” tells the true story of how Chef José Andrés and his team responded to the humanitarian crisis after Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico. Arriving just days after the storm, Andrés confronted widespread destruction. There was no food, water, power, or communication. He began feeding people one meal at a time. From cooking at ruined restaurants to preparing 100,000 meals daily across multiple kitchens, he provided sustenance while highlighting systemic inefficiencies in disaster relief. The book shows how community-driven action can create real change, offering lessons for future crises, and supporting ongoing relief through World Central Kitchen.
A Look Inside: “There is no recovery to manage, and no citizens to govern, if we cannot get water and food to the people.”
“We Fed an Island” tells the true story of how Chef José Andrés and his team responded to the humanitarian crisis after Hurricane Maria devastated Puerto Rico. Arriving just days after the storm, Andrés confronted widespread destruction. There was no food, water, power, or communication. He began feeding people one meal at a time. From cooking at ruined restaurants to preparing 100,000 meals daily across multiple kitchens, he provided sustenance while highlighting systemic inefficiencies in disaster relief. The book shows how community-driven action can create real change, offering lessons for future crises, and supporting ongoing relief through World Central Kitchen.
A Look Inside: “There is no recovery to manage, and no citizens to govern, if we cannot get water and food to the people.”
Learn More About the Issues on This Page
Related Content
-
Press ReleaseMar 2026
Free Speech
10th Circuit Hears Arguments In Major Educational Censorship Case. Explore Press Release.10th Circuit Hears Arguments in Major Educational Censorship Case
DENVER – The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments today in BERT v. Drummond, a major educational censorship case stemming from a 2021 law that has chilled classrooms across Oklahoma. Students and teachers argued that HB 1775, which prohibits instructors from “mak[ing] part of a course” eight prohibited concepts related to race and sex, is unconstitutionally vague and has caused a chilling effect for teachers. Similar laws and policies have popped up throughout the country at the state and local level, many of which have been found by district courts to be unconstitutional. BERT v. Drummond was the first federal case challenging such a law. “The law’s impossibly vague language, including a sentence with a triple negative, puts teachers in an impossible bind,” said Emerson Sykes, senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union’s Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “They can teach children about hard things in the world around them and risk losing their teaching licenses, or they can or self-censor and deprive students of important educational opportunities. This Court has the power to block the law and stop the chill.” In 2024, the federal court blocked the enforcement of two of the eight prohibited concepts that restrict K-12 instruction because they are vague, fail to let educators know what course material is prohibited, and could prevent discussions of a wide variety of ideas, including those that are the subject to current political debates. These provisions remain enjoined. The Oklahoma Supreme Court also clarified that the law does not apply to academic speech in higher education. “Today marks another step in the fight for Oklahoma K-12 teachers and students, who continue to face vague and confusing limits on their ability to speak and learn in the classroom,” said Megan Lambert, legal director for the ACLU of Oklahoma. “It is beyond time our students get back to having open and equitable dialogue about our country’s history — one that includes the experiences and viewpoints of people of color and other marginalized communities, without partisan and discriminatory restrictions. Our history as a state and country cannot be erased, and the ability to discuss and debate ideas, even those that some may find uncomfortable, is a crucial part of our democracy.” “We are asking the Tenth Circuit to finish the job,” said Maya Brodziak, senior counsel with Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. “Students and teachers have suffered under the vagueness of this law for years, and countless Oklahoma children have been deprived of valuable opportunities to learn about themselves and the nation’s history. The First Amendment protects the freedom to learn.” Attorneys for the students and teachers further argue that HB 1775 violates students’ First Amendment rights to receive information and that the court should reject the government’s radical argument that class instruction is “government speech.” The suit was originally filed in 2021 by the ACLU, the ACLU of Oklahoma, Lawyers Committee, and McDermott, Will & Schulte LLP filed suit against HB 1775 on behalf of a broad group of public school teachers and students. For more information about the case, see here.Court Case: Black Emergency Response Team v. DrummondAffiliate: Oklahoma -
Press ReleaseMar 2026
Free Speech
Georgetown Peace Scholar Detained For Speech Last Year Asks Appeals Court To Reaffirm His Freedom. Explore Press Release.Georgetown Peace Scholar Detained for Speech Last Year Asks Appeals Court to Reaffirm His Freedom
RICHMOND, Va. – Georgetown scholar Dr. Badar Khan Suri was at the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals today asking the court to affirm previous lower court rulings that ordered the government to release him on bail. Exactly one year ago today, ICE grabbed Dr. Suri as he came home from an iftar celebration, put him on a plane, and then detained him for nearly six weeks at a private detention center in Texas known for its human rights abuses. To this day, the only justification for Dr. Suri’s arrest remains his advocacy in support of Palestinian rights and his family ties to Gaza. “When I came to America to study how governments descend into authoritarianism, I could never have expected to be living the very research I came here to do, and yet today marks exactly one year since I was brutally taken from my family and unjustly imprisoned by the U.S. government for voicing my opposition to Israel’s atrocities in Gaza,” said Dr. Badar Khan Suri. “I’m grateful to be standing here as a free man, but terrified that it could be taken away from me at any moment. I am asking the Fourth Circuit to affirm what every American schoolchild is taught, that in this country, you cannot be thrown in prison for speaking truth to power.” In its appeal, the administration took a narrow view of the courts’ habeas jurisdiction, arguing that because it quickly swept Dr. Suri out of Virginia without notice to his family or lawyers, the Virginia court does not have jurisdiction to hear his petition, and that it should be handled by a court in Texas. It also argued that no federal district court has authority to review the constitutionality of Dr. Suri’s detention until the executive branch finishes its own administrative immigration process, which can take months or years. “The First Amendment protects all of us, regardless of our political opinions or associations – and we all deserve speedy protection from the courts when that right is infringed upon. When the government ignores those rights to go after a peace studies scholar, we’re all in danger,” said Noor Zafar, senior staff attorney with the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project. “The government's attempt to weaponize immigration law to silence dissent and take away someone’s liberty is unconstitutional and should worry every person in this country. We won’t stop fighting to keep Dr. Suri free, and home with his wife and children where he belongs.” In court, Dr. Suri’s legal team explained that the federal court in Virginia has jurisdiction over Dr. Suri’s habeas petition, and he must remain free while his case is considered. “Courts have always been an important check on unlawful government attempts to silence and retaliate against people for their speech, and Dr. Suri’s case should be no different. The Trump administration is trying to silence speech it doesn’t agree with by targeting people like Dr. Suri and Mahmoud Khalil, but ideas are not illegal,” said Geri Greenspan, senior staff attorney with ACLU of Virginia. “Americans don't want to live in a country where the federal government can lock people up just because it doesn't like their views.” Dr. Suri is challenging his arrest and detention under the First Amendment, the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, and the Administrative Procedure Act. He is represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, the ACLU of Virginia, the Center for Constitutional Rights, and Van Der Hout LLP.Court Case: Suri v. TrumpAffiliate: Virginia -
News & CommentaryMar 2026
Free Speech
One Year Later: Georgetown Scholar Illegally Detained For His Speech Returns To Court. Explore News & Commentary.One Year Later: Georgetown Scholar Illegally Detained for His Speech Returns to Court
The ACLU is in court this week with Dr. Badar Khan Suri fighting the Trump administration’s unconstitutional attempt to re-detain him for exercising his First Amendment rights.By: Noor Zafar, Ellessandra Taormino -
Press ReleaseMar 2026
Free Speech
Government Seeks To Resume Immigration Proceedings Against Mohsen Mahdawi. Explore Press Release.Government Seeks to Resume Immigration Proceedings Against Mohsen Mahdawi
NEW YORK — After an immigration judge tossed the case against Mohsen Mahdawi last month, citing the government’s failure to authenticate evidence, the government has asked the Board of Immigration Appeals to resume deportation proceedings. Mr. Mahdawi was detained in ICE custody in April 2025 for over two weeks in retaliation for his speech in support of Palestinian human rights. “This is another cruel step in the government's continued retaliation campaign against our client,” said Cyrus Mehta of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC. “Their attempts to punish him for his constitutionally protected speech about Palestine have been reckless and shameful, and this appeal amounts to them grasping at straws. We look forward to the day that Mohsen can focus his attention where it belongs: on his studies, on his advocacy for peace, and on seeking justice in his communities without worrying about the government violating his rights again.” Mr. Mahdawi’s legal team has filed a cross-appeal asking the Board of Immigration Appeals to terminate the case with prejudice to prevent the government from refiling the case. In February, an immigration judge terminated the case against Mr. Mahdawi because the government failed to authenticate their primary piece of evidence, a memorandum purportedly from Secretary of State Marco Rubio claiming that Mr. Mahdawi’s protected political speech constituted a threat to U.S. foreign policy. “This appeal is not about me,” said Mohsen Mahdawi. “It is about whether the Trump administration can weaponize immigration law to silence dissent and punish those who dare to speak against Israel’s genocide and aggression. I stand not only for the freedom of Palestinians or for my own constitutional rights, but for the sacred promise that in America no human being should fear losing their liberty for exercising their First Amendment rights, including speaking for human rights and against wars.” Mr. Mahdawi was released from ICE custody on bail on April 30, 2025, after filing a habeas petition in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont in which he argued he was wrongfully detained in retaliation for his constitutionally protected speech. His habeas proceedings are ongoing. The news of the immigration appeal and cross-appeal were conveyed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in a supplemental authority letter on Monday morning. “These proceedings in immigration court highlight the need for judicial review of habeas claims challenging irreparable First Amendment harm from immigration detention,” said Nate Freed Wessler, deputy director of the Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project. “The government has not even bothered to authenticate their so-called evidence against our client, yet they claim they should have the right to keep him detained until they’ve run out the clock on the lengthy immigration court process. It’s ludicrous and it’s an affront to our bedrock constitutional protections.” Mr. Mahdawi is represented in both immigration and federal court by Cyrus Mehta and David Isaacson of Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC and in federal court by Luna Droubi, Matthew Melewski, and Tala Alfoqaha of Beldock Levine & Hoffman LLP; Andrew Delaney of Martin Delaney & Ricci Law Group; CLEAR; the American Civil Liberties Union; and the ACLU of Vermont.Court Case: Mahdawi v. TrumpAffiliate: Vermont