How to Win an Election From Jail
January 13, 2022
Joel Castón was incarcerated when he was 18 years old. He’s now 45 and in November of last year, just two months ago, Joel was released after serving over 26 years. While incarcerated, he received a degree through the Georgetown Prison Scholars Program and started a mentorship initiative called Young Men Emerging. And, because D.C. changed the law to allow incarcerated people to vote, he ran for office, and he won: he is now an Advisory Neighborhood Commissioner in Washington D.C. representing the 7th Ward including the jail that he just walked out of. He’s the first incarcerated person in D.C. history to win elected office. Joel joins us today to talk about his experience, what he’s focusing on as a newly elected commissioner in D.C., and how he’s changing the public narrative about incarcerated people.
In this episode
This Episode Covers the Following Issues
-
Access to the Courts and Counsel
-
Alternatives to Incarceration
-
Alternatives to Youth Incarceration
-
Civil Liberties
-
Civil Liberties in Prison
-
Criminal Law Reform
-
Cruel, Inhuman, and Degrading Conditions
-
Discrimination
-
Free Speech in Prison
-
Human Rights
-
Human Rights and Criminal Justice
-
Juvenile Justice
-
Parole and Release
-
Prisoners' Rights
-
Race and Criminal Justice
-
Race and Economic Justice
-
Racial Justice
-
Sentencing Reform
-
Smart Justice
-
Youth Incarceration
Related Content
-
Court CaseApr 2026
Civil Liberties
State V. Marquez And State V. Huerta. Explore Case.State v. Marquez and State v. Huerta
This consolidated case arises from two warrantless searches of closed containers belonging to criminal defendants. It raises two key questions: (1) whether the New Mexico Supreme Court should adopt an approach to interpreting the New Mexico Constitution that does not require reference to federal law, and (2) whether the New Mexico Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches provides greater protections against inventory searches by police than does the federal Fourth Amendment standard.Status: Ongoing -
Michigan Supreme CourtMar 2026
Civil Liberties
People V. Jennings. Explore Case.People v. Jennings
This case asks whether Michigan should adopt an approach to state constitutional interpretation that prioritizes Michigan sources and does not automatically require reference to parallel federal provisions or interpretations. The outcome of this case could have significant implications for the constitutional rights of Michiganders because an interpretation of the Michigan Constitution untethered from federal precedent provides an independent, and potentially more expansive, layer of security for individual rights.Status: Ongoing -
News & CommentaryMar 2026
Civil Liberties
Your Questions Answered: Can Congress Stop President Trump's Illegal War Against Iran?. Explore News & Commentary.Your Questions Answered: Can Congress Stop President Trump's Illegal War Against Iran?
Amid President Donald Trump's unconstitutional war against Iran, ACLU experts break down who has the power to declare war — and how Congress can assert its war powers.By: Christopher Anders -
New YorkMar 2026
Civil Liberties
Poe Et Al. V. Harris-madden Et Al.. Explore Case.Poe et al. v. Harris-Madden et al.
The ACLU, NYCLU, Family Justice Law Center, Brooklyn Defender Services, Center for Family Representation, NYU School of Law Family Defense Clinic, and Sullivan & Cromwell have filed a federal class action lawsuit on behalf of three New York parents challenging unconstitutional delays in the appeals process for reports on the Statewide Central Register of Child Abuse and Maltreatment (SCR). Parents who challenge their placement on the registry often wait months—sometimes more than a year—for a final decision. While they wait, they can be shut out of jobs in childcare, education, healthcare, and other fields involving children, and barred from adopting or fostering. Low-income parents, parents of color, and disabled parents are disproportionately policed by the family regulation system—also known as the child welfare system—and more likely to end up on the registry. This lawsuit seeks to ensure that parents have a way to clear their names in a timely manner.Status: Ongoing